Integrative Philosophy as Meta-Pedagogy

Integrating four modalities of philosophy as archetypal paideia

Transformative : Informative : Contemplative : Generative

How the modes of Meta-pedagogy provide Integrative balance

  1. integrative balance between four takes on the reality of the world : existential, substrative, noumenal, essential

  2. integrative balance between four patterns of curriculum  oriented to the world: agonistic, logistic, dialectic, problematic

  3. integrative balance between four positions of teacher perspective: personal, objective, diaphanic, disciplinary

  4. integrative balance between principles of learning: creative, elemental, comprehensive, reflexive

Transformative Meta-pedagogy

Existential World

vivid experience, immediately lived, historically contingent

 

Agonistic Curriculum

paradoxical, contrasting concepts

 

Personal Teaching

subjective, idiocentric, self-referent, I, we as exclusive group

 

Creative Learning

volitional, making a difference in which the new replaces the old

Generative Meta-pedagogy

Essential World

gradated patterns, functions and values, realisable in nature and experience

 

Synoptic Curriculum

problematic, analysis of features, whole and parts seen together as form and matter of the same holistic function

 

Disciplinary Teaching

community of inquiry, disciplinary and transdisciplinary

 

Reflexive Learning

Autonomously active self-completion of specific nature, actualisation of variety of intrinsic functions

Informative Meta-pedagogy

Substrative World

Invisible, material particles, vitalistic forces, underlying causes

 

Logistic Curriculum

computational, relating discrete (simple) units, mechanical

 

Objective Teaching

impersonal, dispassionate, observing objects & effects, it

 

Elemental Learning

simple, self-same, repetitious, recycling the same basic element, nature or essence

Contemplative Meta-pedagogy

Noumenal World

transcending appearances, transphenomenal, supersensible, eternally perfect realm, ideal

 

Dialectical Curriculum

sublational, synthetic unity of contrasts, emerging wholes

 

Diaphanic Teaching

religious, witness to higher wisdom, revelation of absolute knowledge

 

Comprehensive Learning

all-embracing, hierarchically, encompassing, perfect form of the whole

Modality Toolkit

Questions for Synthesis

 

Questions for personal synthesis

How would you stack its four modes in order of relevance to your own personal philosophy of teaching?

Where would you place this modality in order of preference in the practice of Integrative Teaching (compared to meta-pedagogy, depth didactics, thinking in community and curriculum synergy.

Where would you place this modality in overall order of preference out of all sixteen modalities?

Questions for technical eclecticism

Which of the four component modes could enhance learning in your core Integrative practice?

How might this modality as a whole enhance any other modalities you are using?

Which techniques would you want to experiment with to improve your practice?

Questions for theoretical integration

What is the sixfold interplay between these four modes of practice?

What are the contrasts between the modes which make it difficult but still important to practice together?

Why is this modality essential to enhancing the other modalities of integrative teaching?

Questions for assimilative integration

How could the construction of this modality be improved?

How well does it correlate with other fields of practice not included in the EduSynthesis map?

Which missing aspects of theory might provide a better alternative in a map of your own practice?

What  are your personal preferences for imaginative teaching as an adult learner?

How you can appreciate different uses of language for educational purposes: oral language, writing, theoretic writing, reflexive writing?

How can you enhance your own academic writing in higher education?

How can you utilise imaginative teaching resources in your practice to engage learners?

How could you include all four kinds of understanding in one framework?

Teaching Exercises

How would you stack its four modes in order of relevance to your own personal philosophy of teaching?

Mentoring Exercises

Which of the four component modes could enhance learning in your core Integrative practice?

Leadership Exercises

What is the sixfold interplay between these four modes of practice?

Sustainability Exercises

How could the construction of this modality be improved?

© 2024 EduSynthesis

Centre for Mindful Educational Leadership

Tim Saunders PhD

CONTACT US

We're not around right now. But you can send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Sending

Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?